Unlikely Suns Reveal Improbable Planets

Key Concepts
Few if any astronomers expected the sheer diversity of planets beyond our solar system. The most extreme systems are those that orbit neutron stars, white dwarfs and brown dwarfs.
Neutron stars are born in supernova explosions, and planets orbiting them probably congealed from the debris. The bodies orbiting white dwarfs are the hardy survivors of the demise of a sunlike star. And brown dwarfs, themselves barely more massive than planets, nonetheless appear to be sites of planet formation.

Among the most poignant sights in the heavens are white dwarfs. Although they have a mass comparable to our sun’s, they are among the dimmest of all stars and becoming ever dimmer; they do not follow the usual pattern relating stellar mass to brightness. Astronomers think white dwarfs must not be stars so much as the corpses of stars. Each white dwarf was once much like our sun and shone with the same brilliance. But then it began to run out of fuel and entered its stormy death throes, swelling to 100 times its previous size and brightening 10,000-fold, before shedding its outer layers and shriveling to a glowing cinder the size of Earth. For the rest of eternity, it will sit inertly, slowly fading to blackness.

As if this story were not gloomy enough, it gets worse. We and our colleagues have found more than a dozen white dwarfs in our galaxy that are orbited by asteroids, comets and perhaps even planets—entire graveyards of worlds. While the stars were still alive, they rose every day in the skies of these worlds. They gently warmed the soil and stirred the wind. Living organisms may have soaked up their rays. But when the stars died, they vaporized or engulfed and incinerated their inner planets, leaving only the bodies that resided in the chilly outposts. Over time the dwarfs shredded and consumed many of the survivors as well. These decimated systems offer a grim look at the fate of our own solar system when the sun dies five billion years from now.

Astronomers have always suspected that planets might orbit stars other than our sun. We imagined, though, that we would find systems much like our own solar system, centered on a star much like the sun. Yet when a flood of discoveries began 15 years ago, it was apparent right away that extrasolar planetary systems can differ dramatically from our solar system. The first example was the sunlike star 51 Pegasi, found to have a planet more massive than Jupiter on an orbit smaller than that of Mercury. As instruments became more sensitive, they found ever stranger instances. The sunlike star HD 40307 hosts three planets with masses between four and 10 Earth masses, all on orbits less than half the size of Mercury’s. The sunlike star 55 Cancri A has no fewer than five planets, with masses ranging from 10 and 1,000 Earth masses and orbital radii ranging from one tenth that of Mercury to about that of Jupiter. Planetary systems imagined in science fiction scarcely compare.

The white dwarf systems demonstrate that the stars do not even need to be sunlike. Planets and planetary building blocks can orbit bodies that are themselves no larger than planets. The variety of these systems equals that of systems around ordinary stars. Astronomers hardly expected the ubiquity of planetary systems, their hardiness and the apparent universality of the processes by which they form. Solar systems like our own might not be the most common sites for planets, or even life, in the universe.

Phoenix from the Ashes
It is sometimes forgotten today, but the first confirmed discovery of any extrasolar planets was around a very unsunlike star: the neutron star PSR 1257+12, an even more extreme type of stellar corpse than a white dwarf. It packs a mass greater than the sun’s into the size of a small asteroid, some 20 kilometers across. The event that created this beast, the supernova explosion of a star 20 times the mass of the sun, was more violent than the demise of a sunlike star, and it is hard to imagine planets surviving it. Moreover, the star that exploded probably had a radius larger than 1 AU (astronomical unit, the Earth-sun distance), which is larger than the orbits of the planets we see today. For both reasons, those planets must have risen up out of the ashes of the explosion.

Although supernovae typically eject most of their debris into interstellar space, a small amount remains gravitationally bound and falls back to form a swirling disk around the stellar remnant. Disks are the birthing grounds of planets. Astronomers think our solar system took shape when an amorphous interstellar cloud of dust and gas collapsed under its own weight. The conservation of angular momentum, or spin, kept some of the material from simply falling all the way to the newborn sun; instead it settled into a pancake shape. Within this disk, dust and gas coagulated into planets [see “The Genesis of Planets,” by Douglas N. C. Lin; Scientific American, May 2008]. Much the same process could have occurred in the postsupernova fallback disk.

Source:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=improbable-planets